For this blog I will refer to the Combined Tackle Efficiency rating for middle linebackers (MLB). PFF also provides Tackle Efficiency for run plays only, as well as pass plays only. I believe the combined rating is the best one when trying to determine which players are the best at performing the actual act of tackling.
Athough this is a new stat/rating, I have shown in my previous blog on Corner Back (CB) TAK attribute that missed tackles could have been used previously to come up with a more consistent and accurate TAK attribute. That said. With this new Tackle Efficiency Rating from PFF, it should be even easier for EA to provide accurate, consistent, and realistic tackle attributes in future Madden titles.
Of course, we all must first agree that the TAK attribute is the ability of said player to perform the act of tackling. We must be clear, Tackle Efficiency isn't about the total number of tackles a player makes. Tackle Efficiency is about how well the player performs the act of tackling.
Today, I selected the top 10 Middle Linebackers (MLB) in Madden 12 (based on most current update) and used the TAK attribute to sort them. You will see a lot of familiar names on this list. I than took the last 3 years of Tackle Efficiency Ratings and included those figures in a table to analyze. This will give us a better idea of the current accuracy of the TAK attribute for MLBs. I intentionally did not include total tackles. All of these players have posted high tackle numbers in the past/present and I don't believe the number of tackles should decide how well a player tackles in Madden. I also picked one MLB out of the top 10 for comparison, that is Paul Posluszny. Posluszny keep showing up among the top players in Tackle Efficiency so I decided to include him out of curiosity.
Here is the table:
TAK = Madden 12 tackle attribute as of most updated roster 1/10/11.
TakEff = ProFootballFocus Combined Tackle Efficiency Rating (the number of attempted tackles per miss.) ** Please note, the higher the number, the better the Tackle Efficiency.
Top 10 Middle LB's for TAK attribute in Madden 12 | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 3YR AVG | ||||
Name | TAK | TakEff | TakEff | TakEff | TakEff | ||
Fletcher | 99 | 9.1 | 12.6 | 11.2 | 11.0 | ||
Beason | 97 | N/A IR | 16.0 | 12.0 | 14.0 | ||
Lofton | 96 | 11.2 | 9.9 | 10.5 | 10.5 | ||
Willis | 96 | 36.5 | 13.4 | 30.3 | 26.7 | ||
Tulloch | 96 | 12.4 | 15.2 | 9.9 | 12.5 | ||
Jackson | 96 | 14.8 | N/A IR | 11.3 | 13.1 | ||
Laurinaitis | 96 | 27.5 | 14.3 | 21.0 | 20.9 | ||
E.J. Henderson | 96 | 10.5 | 11.7 | 14.0 | 12.1 | ||
Lewis | 96 | 11.9 | 10.5 | 13.1 | 11.8 | ||
Urlacher | 96 | 10.7 | 9.3 | N/A IR | 10.0 | ||
Posluszny | 94 | 18.4 | 23.5 | 14.7 | 18.9 | 30.5 at OLB in 2010 | |
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 3YR AVG | ||||
Name | TAK | TakEff | TakEff | TakEff | TakEff | ||
Willis | 96 | 36.5 | 13.4 | 30.3 | 26.7 | ||
Laurinaitis | 96 | 27.5 | 14.3 | 21.0 | 20.9 | ||
Beason | 97 | N/A IR | 16.0 | 12.0 | 14.0 | ||
Jackson | 96 | 14.8 | N/A IR | 11.3 | 13.1 | ||
Tulloch | 96 | 12.4 | 15.2 | 9.9 | 12.5 | ||
E.J. Henderson | 96 | 10.5 | 11.7 | 14.0 | 12.1 | ||
Lewis | 96 | 11.9 | 10.5 | 13.1 | 11.8 | ||
Fletcher | 99 | 9.1 | 12.6 | 11.2 | 11.0 | ||
Lofton | 96 | 11.2 | 9.9 | 10.5 | 10.5 | ||
Urlacher | 96 | 10.7 | 9.3 | N/A IR | 10.0 | ||
Posluszny | 94 | 18.4 | 23.5 | 14.7 | 18.9 | 30.5 at OLB in 2010 | |
The first table is sorted by the best Tackle (TAK) attribute in Madden 12, the second table is sorted by the best three year average for Combined Tackle Efficiency. I highlighted the highest in each column.
Observations:
1. Based on this group of MLBs, Patrick Willis has clearly been the best at performing the act of tackling, followed by James Laurinaitis.
2. While London Fletcher continues to pile up the tackles year after year, his actual TakEff is toward the bottom of this list. Maybe the number of tackles a player makes in a season is what EA has been using to determine the TAK attribute. Remember, prior to this new stat, missed tackles were still being tracked and could easy have been utilized to come up with a number for Missed Tackle% or Tackle Efficiency.
3. While all of these players have an elite TAK attribute in Madden, is it to much to ask for the best tacklers to get recognized as such. Granted, they lumped several good tacklers together, but shouldn't Willis, Laurinaitis, and Posluszny have a better tackle attribute than Fletcher?
4. If we use these same attribute numbers, but assign them based on the average Tackle Efficiency for the last three years, it would look something like this:
Name | TAK |
Willis | 99 |
Laurinaitis | 97 |
Posluszny | 96 |
Beason | 96 |
Jackson | 96 |
Tulloch | 96 |
E.J. Henderson | 96 |
Lewis | 96 |
Fletcher | 96 |
Lofton | 96 |
Urlacher | 94 |
If we used only the Tackle Efficiency numbers from this season, if would look like this:
Name | TAK |
Willis | 99 |
Laurinaitis | 97 |
Posluszny | 96 |
Jackson | 96 |
Tulloch | 96 |
Lewis | 96 |
Lofton | 96 |
Urlacher | 96 |
E.J. Henderson | 96 |
Fletcher | 96 |
Beason | 94 |
Notice the top players in 2011 are also the top players in 3 years average.
5. I prefer to look at things in 3 or 4 year blocks when applicable. Obviously rookies and FAs with no history in the NFL need to be considered differently.
6. I would suggest leaving Beason at his 3 year average since he was injured, while moving Fletcher down the list.
7. What do you do about role players and players who don't see much action? First, I would use what data is available. NFL stats, College stats, College analysis/Draft profile and anything else having to do with the player's ability to tackle. Next, would be to discuss this attribute with a ratings team. I mean a real ratings team, not just one person. A group of objective individuals coming to a consensus on that player's attribute. Until further data/stats paint a clearer picture, this attribute rating will be assigned while considering similar players at the position with a similar NFL history.
8. While these selected players don't show drastic differences in the TAK attribute, once you enter the tackle efficiency rating to the table the inaccuracy is clear. There are several lower rated MLBs in Madden 12, that actually tackle better than some players on this list. I stuck with this group because it shows that even among the BIG names, there is a clear difference in Tackle Efficiency.
9. If the total number of tackles was to play a role in a Madden attribute, shouldn't it be pursuit (PUR)? Let me know what you think.
More good stuff...
ReplyDeletewhat he said!
ReplyDeleteYou should account for the bigger gaps, if Willis is a 99, Laurinatis should be an 95, Posluszny a 91...
I don't disagree. I was just showing how it would work with just these current attribute ratings. To do this accurately and consistently for the ever Madden roster, you would do every player and develop a range to slot each of them into. Thanks for the feedback.
ReplyDeleteinteresting!
ReplyDelete